As the AV business gets overcome with environmentally friendly buzz,
some companies face hard choices while others find ways to exploit
opportunity.
As with pretty much every industry, especially those built around the
manufacturing and deployment of sophisticated electronics, the
audiovisual and IT businesses are ripe right now with buzzwords and
hype tied to the green movement.
From ubiquitous company-sponsored recycling programs to industry task
forces to manufacturer press releases, it seems that virtually everyone
is looking to tout products and services that use fewer hazardous
materials, consume less energy, and produce less waste.
“Everyone we’ve spoken with, from distributors to manufacturers, has
expressed an interest in this,” says Elizabeth Eames, communication
director for Project Green AV, a non-profit industry education group
based in Long Island, NY that was kick-started about a year ago by AV
dealer Projector Lamp Services.
“As an industry, we’re trying to be more compliant and sustainable,”
adds Michael Dannenberg, senior technology consultant for Vantage
Technology Consulting Group. “A lot of companies out there are trying
to do their part right now.”
Certainly, it must be assumed that much of this stems from earnest good
intentions, a desire to make the Earth a cooler, less polluted place.
And, of course, with the entire world more culturally and politically
tuned into environmental causes these days, a lot of it is about basic
product marketing.
“If we can say we’re greener than the other guy, there is an advantage
to that,” adds Eric Anderson, VP of manufacturing for QSC Audio, which
has taken steps recently to limit, among other things, manufacturing
and packaging waste.
Meanwhile, green marketing, in a lot of cases, is also getting applied
to things like energy-saving techniques that manufacturers would
naturally employ anyway simply because they save money. “I’ll be honest
with you, if we reduce power consumption [during manufacturing], we
reduce costs and increase profit,” says Anderson.
With so much green rhetoric floating around, it’s a little tough to get
a clear picture on all that is really being done right now by AV
manufacturers and dealers to make the industry more environmentally
sustainable. But largely because of stringent environmental legislation
coming out of the European Union, there has actually been a great deal
of movement on the part of AV and IT manufacturers lately to change the
way their products are produced and what goes into them.
Perhaps most influential has been the EU’s Restriction of Hazardous
Substances directive (RoHS), which officially took effect in July 2006.
Essentially, RoHS prohibits the use of hazardous materials, including
lead, mercury, and cadmium, in things like toys and electronics sold in
EU member companies. “We want to be in business in Europe, so we
comply,” says Steve Lampen, multimedia technology manager for Belden
Electronics and Communications.
“It is a challenge,” Anderson adds. “If you do not meet these
regulations, then you will be limited in the markets you can go into.”
“Following the implementation of RoHS, each of the more than 6,000
individual products in Belden’s catalog had to be altered,” Lampen
notes, with materials deemed hazardous by the EU stripped out and
replaced with an acceptable alternative. Most impactful to Belden,
Lampen explains, is the restriction on lead use. Switching to lead-free
solder has increased, over the last several years, the incidence of
failure in electronic components due to tin whiskers, in which tin
coatings sprout microscopic crystalline fibers that break off and cause
short circuits.
“The repercussions have been huge,” Lampen adds. “For example, lead was
also commonly used in the jackets of cables as a compound to stabilize
the color. Without lead, under fluorescent light, the color is wiped
out after just a few years. We’ve since found compounds that keep the
color in, but it’s taken time and money.”
Without hazarding a guess in terms of an overall dollar figure, Lampen
says it was “quite a stretch and investment right off the bat” for
Belden to render itself RoHS compliant. “But it would have been way too
much trouble to maintain two separate product lines.”
Philosophically, Lampen supports such environmental legislation. “We
have 200 years of the Industrial Revolution that we have to pay for,”
he notes, even though he doesn’t agree always on the precise execution
of these laws. “It’s easy to say let’s get rid of something without
looking at all the financial obligations that grow out of that.”
Inevitably, he says, directives like RoHS — enacted at a time when the
U.S. government had largely abdicated any global leadership role in
terms of environmental legislation — will mean that technology managers
will end up paying more for AV- and IT-related goods and services.
“There’s a percentage in the price tag to be green, and you’re going to
pay for that,” he adds. But for all its impact, RoHS is just the
beginning.
Of particular concern for electronics manufacturers competing on the
global stage right now is the so-called China RoHS, which restricts the
same six substances that the EU directive does. Ultimately, it’s
expected that the Chinese restrictions will be enhanced as to be even
more stringent. “That will be even harder,” Lampen says. “We’ll be
looking at a longer list of things that are not allowed.”
Meanwhile, back in the EU, Anderson says the emerging REACH directive
(Regulation, Evaluation, Authorization of Chemicals) will also soon
impact entire supply chains of globally positioned manufacturers, with
the chemicals and substances used during the making of products
scrutinized. “The good news for us is that we tend to have very dry
manufacturing processes,” Anderson notes. “We’re an assembly house. But
we do use things that are made with chemicals, so there will be some
restrictions. Ultimately, I think there will a bigger price tag for
everyone than RoHS has had. There will be some difficulties in meeting
that requirement.”
More pressing to Costa Mesa, CA-based QSC is the fact that it operates
its manufacturing plant in the most environmentally progressive state
in the country. For example, on January 1 of this year, the California
Air Resources Board began regulating formaldehyde emissions from
particle board, which is used in loudspeaker cabinet manufacturing. “I
think that law is going to go global,” Anderson says.
Meanwhile, the British press reported earlier this year that the EU is
also close to passing energy performance standards on televisions. Such
a mandate, the media reports claimed, would diminish the sales of a
number of power-hungry plasma display models.
Jim Noecker, director of systems sales engineering for Panasonic
Professional Display Company, acknowledges, “We’re definitely feeling
the push to be more green and energy efficient,” while noting that his
company has rid its products of lead and mercury. However, as much as
it wants to improve its product’s environmental efficacy, Noecker says
that “progress” will come from changing the testing methods for plasma,
not the product design.
“The energy use specification on our plasmas is peak power usage, which
is very misleading,” he explains. “Actual consumption on normal usage
could be 50 percent of that. With plasma, we have to dispel the myth on
energy use.”
While AV vendors are reacting in various ways to the myriad
environmental mandates that are popping up all over the globe, there
are other, less mandatory pressures for the industry to consider. AV
and IT systems integrators, for example, are increasingly being asked
to design systems that acknowledge the U.S. Green Building Council’s
Leadership in Energy and Environmentazl Design (LEED) guidelines. As it
stands right now, there isn’t even a criteria for AV or IT within LEED.
However, there exists a strong belief among AV/IT business denizens
that a day will come when virtually every new building project will
fall under the guidelines, and only LEED-certified contractors and
manufacturers will be eligible to bid.
Meanwhile, at June’s InfoComm conference in Orlando, representatives
are meeting to further develop green standards for AV. Among other
topics, they’ll discuss ways in which the industry can not only save
energy, but contribute sustainable instruments to the building process
like lighting control, as well as reduce use of nonrecyclable materials
through executions like digital signage and cut transportation fuel
usage through videoconferencing.
Of course, a lot of these missions seem more intended to develop new
business than to cure what ails the planet. But to Vantage Consulting’s
Dannenberg, the purity of the intentions — whether opportunistic or
coerced — is irrelevant as long as the AV/IT industry is getting
cleaner and more efficient. “It may be only about marketing to some at
this point,” he says “but at the end of the day, if it’s sustainable,
is that a bad thing?”
Daniel Frankel is a Los Angeles-based freelancer who regularly writes
about the businesses of entertainment and technology. He can be reached
at frankel_daniel@hotmail.com.
Got a comment? Contact us at AVT@nbmedia.com, and type the title of this article into the subject header.